CO129-508-11 Copies of Ordinances and amendments with relating correspondence 17-12-1927 - 17-7-1928 — Page 9

.9

Apparently it is held that the Ordinance comes

under this Article as the Governor has forwarded

a certificate as required by it. It does

not, however, contain any clause saving the

rights of H.M. etc. as directed in the first

sentence of the Article. I do not quite see how these rights could be effected but since the

Ordinance is held to come under that Article

it should presumably contain such a clause.

If this is agreed I do not know whether it is

necessary to re-enact the whole Ordinance or to

pass an amending Ordinance inserting such a clause.

or whether we can allow it to stand as passed

while drawing the attention of the Governor to the

omission.

Elmi

29.6.28

I do not think this is a puvate bill

within the

R. J.

meaning of Art : XXVI of the

comment on the absence of

the clause refined to sumo to me

un.

necessay.

Dr.

I

29.6.28

am content to accept low Shrhardt's

view

that this does

not

Come

under Art XXVIL

of the R.D.

hub

In Came points out, the

offeraite view is latten in the dash.

? Sanction 47

CAR

577625

Joy 21 2 DAG 229

Mr.

Exfz (20 Ianalo) 9- JII 199€